Australian politicians, commentators and interest groups have embarked on a public discussion about tax reform. The main focus is the GST (goods and services tax = value added tax). Should the rate, which has remained at 10% since inception in 2000, be increased to 15%? Should the base be broadened to include some or all of the 53% of goods and services that are GST-free?
There is one thing that everyone agrees on: whatever changes are made to the tax system, they must be fair. I haven’t heard anyone say, “What this country needs is unfair taxation!” But I suspect that the concept of fairness is not universal.
The Australian Council of Social Service (ACOSS) describes itself as “the national voice for the needs of people affected by poverty and inequality.” In their eyes ‘fairness’ means not increasing the share of the tax burden born by the poor. In a radio interview this morning an ACOSS representative expressed the view that no household with an annual income below $100,000* should have to pay more tax than they do now.
But some other people see fairness differently. They think that people who work hard, learn productive skills, practise thrift and invest prudently should, in fairness, be allowed to reap and keep the harvest that results from this pattern of behaviour.
What do I think?
- We cannot continue running a fiscal deficit forever.
- The cost of health care will continue rising faster than GDP as more ways are found to cure illnesses and keep people alive.
- The cost of supporting and caring for old people and disabled people will also rise faster than GDP.
- Richer people are better able than poor people to minimise the amount of tax they pay – ultimately by emigrating.
- Multinational corporations will always find ways to avoid paying normal rates of tax in the countries where they make their money.
Putting all these thoughts together, I don’t see how anyone but the very poorest can avoid paying more, either through taxes or by paying the full price for things that they have been accustomed to getting free or at subsidised prices.
* From official statistics for 2013-14 I infer that about two-thirds of Australian households fall below this threshold.
2 thoughts on “Fairness”
I’m a bit more of a socialist than you are, Ron, but I often find myself dumbfounded by the ways governments find to give subsidies to people who don’t need them and after a while regard them as entitlements.
Our governments could spend less. To start, they could get out of regulating everything and intruding so much in our lives.